Showing posts sorted by relevance for query intelligence. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query intelligence. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, December 8, 2016

Yes, Sex Robots Are a Thing and Here's Everything You Want to Know

Sex robots may be all over science fiction, but our real sexy-AI future is probably closer than you thought.

As 2016 comes to a close, it's worthwhile to ask where we're at, sex robot-wise, as we move into the new yearâ€"and the answer depends on what kind of sex robot you're looking for. First, there are the "escort" services in Japan and South Korea that let people rent out technologically-advanced sex dolls. Though we already knew about American artist Matt McMullen's "RealDolls,", lifelike sex dolls that can be modeled after real people (like the one Ryan Gosling fell in love with in Lars and the Real Girl), he's currently adding artificial intelligence so they can talk to their human companions. And engineer Douglas Hines invented a robot named Roxxxy, which (or is it who?) responds verbally to touch and can talk about the news.

Thankfully, it doesn't look like sexbots are in danger of replacing human partnersâ€"at least for now. According to a survey by Tufts University researchers, most people agree that having sex with a robot is more like using a sex toy than sleeping with a person. But even when sex is taken off the table, our artificial friends could have some other interesting uses in the future.

We asked sexual biotechnology researcher Nicole Prause, PhD, if what's available now really counts as a sex robot and what we can expect in the future.

Would it be fair to say that sex robots already exist?

Nicole Prause: Sure, at the most basic level, sex robots already exist. There are machines to "auto-extract" ejaculate both for fertility and pleasure purposes already. They are not responsive to human preference or feedback, but the mechanics already exist. Responsive characters already exist, tooâ€"they just have to limit your requests of them because they are not very flexible.

What are the most advanced sex robots we have right now?

NP: The most advanced robots in terms of their intelligence do not exist in sex. The most advanced development I have seen for emotional tasks is for automated therapy, such as for PTSD. Studies are being conducted showing that, while people do not ascribe actual human qualities (they do not believe the robot has come to life), they will disclose more emotional content to a robot therapist than to a human therapist. These advances are occurring in collaborations between research psychologists and computer scientists.

What do you think the most advanced sex robots will look like in 10 years, then?

NP: Sex robots in 10 years are likely to be increasingly able to detect sexual movements (e.g., being touched on the nipple and how hard), but so little is known about "typical" sexual interactionsâ€"how many people desire or respond to nipple stimulation and what is optimal pressureâ€"that it will be very difficult to develop accurate "off-the-shelf" robots. The advances are most likely to come with learning algorithms developed for other, non-sexual purposes. The necessity of advanced computing to integrate the information from the periphery (nipple, vulva, et cetera) and the stigma of working in this area suggest sexually-focused robots will not receive attention from the best scientists until sometime far after others have developed related capabilities. I am not optimistic we will see much in 10 years.

Do you see any potential uses for them beyond entertainment?

NP: People can remain aware of the robot as a robot and still have true emotional experiences themselves, and I do not see why sexual experiences would be different in this respect. Much like sex films, which adults overwhelmingly recognize as fantasy, I believe robots will be a useful tool for some people beyond entertainment alone.

What positive effects do you think they could have on our lives?

NP: Robots could be very useful in situations where partner access is not available. For example, therapy to overcome sexual abuse might feel safer to start with a well-controlled, programmed, non-judgemental partner. Those who have difficulty attracting partners, due to mental illness, different physical appearance, or simple disinterest, might choose to enjoy sexual activity with robots. Established romantic relationships could include a robot to increase their sexual breadth. Robots also might serve in a discharge capacityâ€"directing illegal sexual behaviors towards the robot instead of a human.

What negative effects could they have?

NP: The biggest likely negative effect is the technology backlash that always occurs in sexuality: people will be shamed for sexual behaviors with robots. They will be made to feel they are broken, maladjusted, or otherwise lesser. In other words, the most likely negative effects are from the social response to sex robots, not the robots themselves. They also might present a challenge for individuals with social anxiety, who otherwise might be motivated to improve their social interactions out of a desire to attract a sexual partner, have a family, and so on. Of course, any device could carry some basic risk of injury, but I trust those to be minimized, as safety will be in mind with development.

This is likely to mimic what we have seen with sex films: a tiny minority of people who view sex films report having problems with them, while society loses its collective shit with conservative panic about imagined problem. "Loses its collective shit" being a super-professional opinion.

If we want to get an idea of what sex robots could be like one day, do any sci-fi movies actually do a good job depicting them?

NP: No. Movies with sexbots always present them as far more advanced than I can imagine them being in 50 years, much less 10, in terms of emotional simulations. Repetitive sexual movements I expect to become much more realistic more rapidly than the interaction.

Would it be possible for people to one day fall in love with robots?

NP: As with sex films, there will be a tiny minority of people who fail to distinguish reality with robots. I hope we focus on this education rather than demonizing the technology.

"

| Yes, | Robots | Thing | Heres | Everything | Want | Know | robots< | over | science | fiction | real | sexy | future | probably | closer | than | thought | span>< | p> As | 2016 | comes | close | worthwhile | where | were | robot | wise | move | into | yearâ€"and | answer | depends | what | kind | youre | looking | First | there | escort | services< | Japan | South | Korea | that | people | rent | technologically | advanced | dolls | Though | already | knew | about | American | artist | Matt | McMullens | RealDolls | lifelike | modeled | after | (like | Ryan | Gosling | fell | love | with | Lars | Real | Girl< | em>) | currently | adding | artificial | intelligence< | they | talk | their | human | companions | engineer | Douglas | Hines | invented | robot< | named | Roxxxy | which | responds | verbally | touch | news | p> Thankfully | doesnt | look | like | sexbots | danger | replacing | partners< | a>â€"at | least | According | survey< | Tufts | University | researchers | most | agree | having | more | using | sleeping | person | even | when | taken | table | friends | could | have | some | other | interesting | uses | p> We | asked | sexual | biotechnology | researcher | Nicole | Prause | whats | available | really | counts | expect | p> Would | fair | robots | exist | strong>< | p> Nicole | Prause:< | strong> | Sure | basic | level | There | machines | auto | extract | ejaculate< | both | fertility | pleasure | purposes | They | responsive | preference | feedback | mechanics | Responsive | characters | tooâ€"they | just | limit | your | requests | them | because | very | flexible | p> What | right | p> NP:< | terms | intelligence | development | seen | emotional | tasks | automated | therapy | such | PTSD | Studies | being | conducted | showing | while | ascribe | actual | qualities | (they | believe | come | life) | will | disclose | content | therapist | These | advances | occurring | collaborations | between | research | psychologists | computer | scientists | think | years | then | likely | increasingly | able | detect | movements | touched | nipple | hard) | little | known | typical | interactionsâ€"how | many | desire | respond | stimulation | optimal | pressureâ€"that | difficult | develop | accurate | shelf | learning | algorithms | developed | necessity | computing | integrate | information | from | periphery | (nipple | vulva | cetera< | stigma | working | this | area | suggest | sexually | focused | receive | attention | best | until | sometime | others | related | capabilities | optimistic | much | p> Do | potential | beyond | entertainment | People | remain | aware | still | true | experiences | themselves | would | different | respect | Much | films | adults | overwhelmingly | recognize | fantasy | useful | tool | alone | positive | effects | lives | situations | partner | access | example | overcome | abuse | might | feel | safer | start | well | controlled | programmed | judgemental | Those | difficulty | attracting | partners | mental | illness | physical | appearance | simple | disinterest | choose | enjoy | activity | Established | romantic | relationships | include | increase | breadth | also | serve | discharge | capacityâ€"directing | illegal | behaviors | towards | instead | negative | biggest | effect | technology | backlash | always | occurs | sexuality: | shamed | made | broken | maladjusted | otherwise | lesser | words | social | response | present | challenge | individuals | anxiety | motivated | improve | interactions | attract | family | course | device | carry | risk | injury | trust | those | minimized | safety | mind | p> This | mimic | films: | tiny | minority | view | report | problems< | society | loses | collective | shit | conservative | panic | imagined | problem | Loses | super | professional | opinion | p> If | want | idea | movies | actually | good | depicting | Movies | imagine | less | simulations | Repetitive | become | realistic | rapidly | interaction | possible | fall | fail | distinguish | reality | hope | focus | education | rather | demonizing | p> |

Thank You So Much for Read this Article

Friday, December 9, 2016

They’ll only have sex with smart people

Are you the smartest person in the bedroom? If so, you may be sapiosexual, and wasting time by going after hotties who think string theory has something to do with choosing Oxford-style shoes over loafers. According to Vice, sapiosexuals are indulging in the hot fetish of the moment: viewing intelligence as the topmost turn-on.

The term, coined by a live-blogger who calls himself wolfieboy, just might make it into the next edition of Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Regardless, it already qualifies as a descriptor on OkCupid and inspired a Tinder-esque dating app for smart people, called, appropriately enough, Sapio. The fact that the big complaint about Sapio is a lack of participants maybe reflects the selectivity of those who embrace this sexual preference.

But with the growing desirability of Silicon Valley nerds, it seems that sapiosexuality is on the rise. “What were once fringe interests reserved for the stereotypically introverted, intellectual, ‘nerds’ of the world â€" comic books, characters, and comic-inspired films and TV shows, sci-fi and fantasy like the ‘Star Trek’ reboots and ‘Game of Thrones’ â€" are now essential features of 21st-century American culture,” Lora Adair, a professor of evolutionary psychology at Lyon College, told Vice. Her point being that the pursuit of classically geeky interests now comes with cachet.

For those who want to appeal to sapiosexuals, the website New Love Times offers a few tips that go beyond turning public libraries into pickup spots. It suggests that revealing some ignorance is an aphrodisiac for potential partners who enjoy showing their intelligence, flying your nerd-flag proudly can be alluring, and unconventional dating spots â€" adventurous ethnic food will trump a steak every time â€" may seal the deal. Also: Make sure you’re pronouncing words properly and using correct grammar.

While there has been some blowback â€" sapiosexual doubters describe it as pretentious, exclusionary and not even worthy of its own distinction â€" blogger Hazel Leese clearly prefers brains to brawn. “If a man uses a word I’ve never heard before, my attraction radar surges to Defcon 1,” she writes. “Likewise if he uses somewhat poetic, non-standard language, my brain enters orgasmatron mode. Long [and] complicated words, beautiful poetry, technical phrases that I don’t understand are all tantamount to talking dirty to me. In other words, I like big words and I cannot lie.”

Additionally, we presume, when giving brainy dudes her phone number, she doesn’t need to find pen and paper. They’re smart enough to commit 10 digits to memory.

"

| They’ll | only | have | with | smart | people | smartest | person | bedroom | sapiosexual | wasting | time | going | after | hotties | think | string | theory | something | choosing | Oxford | style | shoes | over | loafers | According | Vice< | sapiosexuals | indulging | fetish | moment: | viewing | intelligence | topmost | turn | p> The | term | coined | live | blogger | calls | himself | wolfieboy< | just | might | make | into | next | edition | Merriam | Webster | Dictionary | Regardless | already | qualifies | descriptor | OkCupid | inspired | Tinder | esque | dating | called | appropriately | enough | Sapio< | fact | that | complaint | about | Sapio | lack | participants | maybe | reflects | selectivity | those | embrace | this | sexual | preference | p> But | growing | desirability | Silicon | Valley | nerds | seems | sapiosexuality | rise | “What | were | once | fringe | interests | reserved | stereotypically | introverted | intellectual | ‘nerds’ | world | comic | books | characters | films | shows | fantasy | like | ‘Star | Trek’ | reboots | ‘Game | Thrones’ | essential | features | 21st | century | American | culture | Lora | Adair | professor | evolutionary | psychology | Lyon | College | told | Vice | point | being | pursuit | classically | geeky | comes | cachet | p> For | want | appeal | website | Love | Times< | offers | tips | beyond | turning | public | libraries | pickup | spots | suggests | revealing | some | ignorance | aphrodisiac | potential | partners | enjoy | showing | their | flying | your | nerd | flag | proudly | alluring | unconventional | adventurous | ethnic | food | will | trump | steak | every | seal | deal | Also: | Make | sure | you’re | pronouncing | words | properly | using | correct | grammar | p> While | there | been | blowback | doubters< | describe | pretentious | exclusionary | even | worthy | distinction | Hazel | Leese< | clearly | prefers | brains | brawn | “If | uses | word | I’ve | never | heard | before | attraction | radar | surges | Defcon | writes | “Likewise | somewhat | poetic | standard | language | brain | enters | orgasmatron | mode | Long | [and] | complicated | beautiful | poetry | technical | phrases | don’t | understand | tantamount | talking | dirty | other | cannot | ”< | p> Additionally | presume | when | giving | brainy | dudes | phone | number | doesn’t | need | find | paper | They’re | commit | digits | memory | p> Share | this:< | h3> < | div> |

Thank So Much for Reading this News